01/19/2008 (www.foxnews.com) Greta “On The Record” Update
“Joel Brodsky: Anonymous Text Message, ISP Contempt motion”
http://www.acandyrose.com/2008-01-19-GretaOTR-Update.htm
PLEASE NOTE: This is a RECAP transcript done by an Internet poster known as “Snicker.” (Note: Double spacing added by www.acandyrose.com)
Drew Peterson's Victim Wives??(Stacy Peterson,msg.2007/Kathleen Savio,exp.2004} > STACY PETERSON Weekend Thread
http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php? s=1645de6ff42cae784cc1d20564cd9da9&postid=11113961#post11113961
Snicker
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2007
Location: In the sunny southeast
Posts: 3548
Greta Van Sustern "On the Record" Update:
Panel: Bernie Grimm, Jim Hammer, Ted Williams, Michael Cardoza
GVS: JB filed a motion asking the court to hold ISP in contempt and he'll tell us why. DP says he has proof that SP ran off with another man--the racy text message. DP "that means there's someone else SP was involve with and ISP should be looking at him too."
GVS: Glad you came back. You're a good sport.
JB: I welcome differences of opinion, but I don't like name calling and criticism. On Dec 19 DP called me and told me he found the message on SP's cell phone--she had gotten the new cell phone a couple of weeks before and gave the old one to one of their teenage sons. We have not been able to track down who sent the message because it was sent through the website and not through a cell phone. We're hoping ISP through their warrant can track down the IP address of the person who sent the message. The message had the date stamp of September 20, 2007. There were a number of text messages on there sent to DP's son, but this was the only one directed at Stacy. This particular one was saved in a locked area of the cell phone.
GVS: Has DP been able to determine where SP was that night?
JB: Despite what everyone seems to believe, DP did not track SP's every move. She apparently had a lover and he has no idea who that lover is. He has no idea where she was that night except that she was with her lover.
GVS: (reading today's ISP press release about new evidence and new investigative methods being used and that DP is still the suspect in SP's disappearance)
JB: What this means to me is that ISP has stopped looking for SP and they are going to now build a circumstantial evidence case against Drew. I think it's all bureaucratic double-talk.
GVS: When we come back you can tell us about the motion you filed asking the court to hold ISP in contempt.
(Commercial Break)
GVS: The ISP seized a lot of DP's stuff during the service of the warrant.
JB: The police have not returned the items they were supposed to return to DP by the deadline the judge gave them. When they didn't turn the items over, we filed a motion and then four hours later they showed up at DP's door and turned the items over. I filed the motion for contempt because they did not follow the law.
When the polilce don't folow the law, who do you turn to?
GVS: They still have more of your clients things that they were not told to return to him . . .
JB: We're up on January 25 to see if we can get the rest of the stuff back.
GVS: I can't let you off the hook. You know I have to ask the question everyone wants the answer to. What about the timeline for you client the day his wife went missing?
JB: He gave a complete timeline and statement in the beginning. It's just not smart lawyering for me to share that with you.
GVS: I can understand that he can say his memory was faulty, but you don't have that issue. If the entire story is that DP woke up and she was gone and he can account for his time the rest of the day and he did not pick up Tom Morphey and take him to the coffee shop and they did not move a container from the bedroom to the vehicle then your client has no problem. The ISP have Morphy squirreled away, so that makes everyone wonder and be suspicious. If your client would just come out and say where he was then we could call off the dogs. Without you or your client clarifying his timeline, the suspicion remains high.
JB: I know what you're saying--they can't use my comment as a prior conflicting statement, but it is just not smart lawyering for me to come on here and make any statements regarding my client's timeline. We're just not going to say it here or on any other station.
GVS: You and your client have said he has a timeline that he gave ISP, what would it hurt share that to draw the suspicion off him?
JB: If I can get a copy of his statement from the ISP I will be glad to go over it with you.
GVS: I will contact the ISP and see if I can get a copy of DP's statement and have them give it to you.
JB: If you can do that, I will be glad to sit down with you and go over it with you.
GVS: I will see what I can do. Thank you for coming on again.
__________________
“Expect to have hope rekindled. Expect your prayers to be answered in wondrous ways. The dry seasons in life do not last. The spring rains will come again.” ~ Sarah Ban Breathnach
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
01-19-2008 04:00 AM
Drew Peterson's Victim Wives??(Stacy Peterson,msg.2007/Kathleen Savio,exp.2004} > STACY PETERSON Weekend Thread
http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php? s=1645de6ff42cae784cc1d20564cd9da9&postid=11114648#post11114648
Snicker
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2007
Location: In the sunny southeast
Posts: 3548
Just watched the second airing of GVS's "On the Record" and actually watched instead of transcribing what was being said. These comments by "Stacy's sister" (I'm assuming Cassandra) about the text message were flashed at the bottom of the screen:
--"The text message doesn't even have Stacy's name in it."
--"This is just a smear campaign against Stacy."
--"The source of the text is a public domain."
--"Drew probably sent the text plotting her death."
--"Police knew about this text from day one."
__________________
“Expect to have hope rekindled. Expect your prayers to be answered in wondrous ways. The dry seasons in life do not last. The spring rains will come again.” ~ Sarah Ban Breathnach
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
01-19-2008 06:49 AM