| Mark Beckner Deposition (Atlanta, Georgia)
 Wolf vs Ramsey Civil Action File No. 00-CIV-1187(JEC)
 (Blue Fibers)
 
 63
 2 Q (BY MR. WOOD) Okay. From your -- from
 3 the time period that you have been involved in the
 4 Ramsey case, October of 1997 to date, you have never
 5 publicly referred to any individual as a suspect; am
 6 I right?
 7 A That's correct.
 8 Q You have always carefully indicated that
 9 individuals, whoever may come up, were either not or
 10 were under the umbrella of suspicion?
 11 A Yes.
 12 Q Or used the phrase under suspicion?
 13 A Yes.
 14 Q Which you have told me means the same
 15 thing as being under the umbrella of suspicion?
 16 A Yes.
 17 Q So from start to today, you have not
 18 classified any individual as a suspect?
 19 A Publicly, correct.
 20 Q Or otherwise?
 21 A That's not accurate.
 22 Q How is it inaccurate?
 23 A Internally John and Patsy are considered
 24 suspects.
 25 Q Both of them?
 | . | Mark Beckner Deposition (Atlanta, Georgia)
 Wolf vs Ramsey Civil Action File No. 00-CIV-1187(JEC)
 (Blue Fibers)
 
 64
 1 A Yes.
 2 Q Are considered to have probably been
 3 involved in the death of their daughter?
 4 A Probability, yes.
 5 Q Has anyone else ever attained that status
 6 of probably involved?
 7 A No.
 
 
 (SNIP)
 
 
 152
 1 Q Okay. Is there a difference between being
 2 officially cleared and being unofficially cleared? I
 3 thought earlier you told me that Wolf had not been
 4 cleared. Are you telling me that he has been
 5 unofficially cleared but not officially cleared?
 6 A Well, I think the problem comes in
 7 semantics and people use that term differently and
 8 some detectives may use those words. If you're
 9 asking me is he cleared, I would say -- tell you no.
 10 I would tell anybody no. We haven't cleared anybody
 11 in this case until we solve it. Then everybody
 12 except the person responsible is cleared at that
 13 point.
 |