[ACandyRose Logo] A Personal view of the Internet Subculture
Surrounding the JonBenet Ramsey Murder case

[IMAGE] [IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
This web page is part of a series covering found materials regarding individuals, items or events that apparently became part of what is commonly known as the vortex of the JonBenet Ramsey murder case Christmas night 1996. The webmaster of this site claims no inside official Boulder police information as to who has been interviewed, investigated, the outcome or what information is actually considered official evidence. These pages outline found material which can include but not limited to materials found in books, articles, the Internet, transcripts, depositions, legal documents, Internet discussion forums, graphics or photos, media reports, TV/Radio shows about the JonBenet Ramsey murder case. Found materials are here for historical archive purposes. (www.acandyrose.com - acandyrose@aol.com)
This webpage series is for historical archive and educational purposes on found materials


[---]
---
Evidence - Rope - Found in Guest Room

Lou Smit claims a "sack of rope" found in guest room
Lou Smit says this proves the intruder theory

Michael Kane says the "guest room"
was John Andrew Ramsey bedroom
Michael Kane says it was a "Ruck Sack"
It wasn't a "sack of rope" but a back pack containing rope
Michael Kane says John Andrew Ramsey
was a "backpacker"


CHAIN OF EVENTS 1997


[Boulder News Forum]1997-02-04: Boulder News Forum thread, "RAMSEY CASE WEB SITES"

FROM: jameson EMAIL: LOCATION:
DATE: Tuesday February 04, 1997

Hi.I am new to forum.I spent a lot of time on AOL talking about the case.But how do you know what thread here is the active one. It seems so confused,not just one after the other.I went to one and then it was full and said to start another thread but I do not know how. Help.I will come back here in a while for the answer. Oh the evidence that matched in both Rramsey houses is the rope. But that might not be a strange thing I think.


1997-04-30: John Ramsey Interrogation by Steve Thomas, Tom Trujillo

John Ramsey Interrogation by Steve Thomas, Tom Trujillo
Also present, Pat Burke, Bryan Morgan, Pete Hoffstrom, Jon Foster
April 30, 1997 - Boulder, Colorado
http://www.jonbenetindexguide.com/1997BPD-John-Interview-Complete.htm



JR: Ah, well, I remember they took me aside, and we sat in John Andrew’s room which is the one next to JonBenet’s and she went through what I should do when we talked to the caller and I must insist that I talk to JonBenet and that we need until 5 o’clock to raise the money. I’d actually called my (inaudible) and arranged for the money. Ah, and I think we had by that time started to wonder if one of the housekeepers might be involved. And there was some activity around that direction. We waited until past 11 and then we, and then I think we were in the living room and Linda said why don’t you take someone and look through the house and see if there’s anything you notice that’s unusual. And Fleet and I, Fleet was standing there and said he’d go with me. And we went down to the basement, went into the train room, which is, you know, the train set is, and that’s really the only window that’s, would let in entrance into he basement. And actually I’d gone down there earlier that morning, into that room, and the window was broken, but I didn’t see any glass around, so I assumed it was broken last summer. I used that window to get into the house when (inaudible) I didn’t have a key. But the window was open, about an eighth of an inch, and just kind latched it. So I went back down with Fleet, we looked around for some glass again, still didn’t see any glass. And I told him that I thought that the break came from when I did that last summer and then, then I went from there into the cellar. Pull on the door, it was latched. I reach up and unlatched it, and then I saw the white blanket, (inaudible).



CHAIN OF EVENTS 1998

Rope found in John Andrew's Bedroom
[IMAGE] #113
#114
#115
#116
Photo is screen capture from Court TV "A Second Look" 5/10/03 -- John Ramsey (6/98)

Rope found in John Andrew's Bedroom
(0534-20) LOU SMIT: John Andrew's bedroom, did you ever recall any rope or cord being in his room? JOHN RAMSEY: Gee, it's possible, John Andrew loved the outdoors, he was there, I stayed in that room. I know he had seems like he had his backpack there for a while. So it wouldn't be -- I don't remember seeing any, but it wouldn't be --

(0535-16) LOU SMIT:
But he could have had things there in his backpack? JOHN RAMSEY: It wouldn't have been out of the question. LOU SMIT: Just for the camera, the photographs we are looking at is photo 113, 114, 115 and 116. - (0535-24) BRYAN MORGAN: May I ask just one question. Can you tell us if this is the form in which it was originally found? LOU SMIT: No, that's the bag it was put in for evidence. BRYAN MORGAN: So the paper bag is just in evidence. LOU SMIT: Evidence bag. And again that was just found in the room, and it was found in a bag in her room, that's all I can tell you at this time.
[IMAGE] #113
#114
#115
#116
-- -- Patsy Ramsey (6/98)

Paper Bag (police bag)
(0519-07) TOM HANEY: Next we have photos that are numbered 113. PATSY RAMSEY: Uh-huh (yes). TOM HANEY: Which is a paper bag. PATSY RAMSEY: Uh-huh (yes). TOM HANEY: And then 114 is the contents of that. TRIP DeMUTH: The paper bag is a police bag and this came out of here. PATSY RAMSEY: Oh, this was in here? TRIP DeMUTH: Correct? PATSY RAMSEY: Oh. TRIP DeMUTH: And there's another picture of that same item in 115 and 116. Why don't you look those over at your leisure. PATSY RAMSEY: I don't recognize it, specifically.
[IMAGE] #113
#114
#115
#116
Photo is screen capture from Court TV "A Second Look" 5/10/03 -- Patsy Ramsey (6/98)

Rope (contents of paper bag)
(0520-01) TOM HANEY: Okay. And that, that particular piece of rope, do you ever remember seeing anything like it around? And if you look at photo 115, you notice the -- PATSY RAMSEY: Right. TOM HANEY: -- ends are unusually secured. PATSY RAMSEY: Right. No. TOM HANEY: Can you think of any reason to have that kind of rope around? PATSY RAMSEY: I've just never seen ends like that, done like that. John had some, you know, boat ropes and things up at the lake, but it seems like when they cut those, they kind of melt the ends of them or something to keep them from fraying or something. I've never seen one done like that.

CHAIN OF EVENTS 2001


[http://www.rockymountainnews.com/]2001-05-05: Rocky Mountain News "Clues in the Case"

"Disturbance in guest room: Smit speculates that the guest bedroom, next to JonBenet's room, was a good hiding place for the killer if he entered the house before the Ramsey's got home that night. The room has a window that overlooks the garage, allowing the person to see when the Ramseys returned. The room would have allowed the killer to hide upstairs without taking a chance that the couple would hear him creeping up the stairs later. Smit noticed an area around the bed where the dust ruffle was disturbed -- though it's neatly tucked in everywhere else. Did the killer hide under the bed? Also, drawers in the guest bathroom were ajar, as if somebody were looking for something. The killer could have hid here, waited until everyone was asleep, walked next door to JonBenet's room, stun-gunned her and carried her to the basement.

Sack of rope: A sack of rope was found in the guest bedroom. The Ramseys said they don't know where it came from. "Was this something left behind by the killer? Why would they have a rope in a guest room?"


[Fox News Report]2001-05-21: Fox News Report: "JonBenet: Search for the truth"
(Thanking LizzieB on www.crimeNews2000.com for the Fox News Transcripts)

---


[Screen Capture by Jayelles 'Who Killed The Pageant Queen' UK Documentary 07-11-2001]2001-07-11: Michael Tracey's "Who Killed The Pageant Queen"
Transcript/Screen Captures compliments of "Jayelles"

LOU SMIT: (back in house) - "Whether or not the note was written in this alcove or not we don't know, but we do know that the ransom note was found on the bottom step of this spiral staircase. From here it’s only a short distance to JonBenét's room. This is JonBenét's bedroom but the door right next to it is the guest bedroom and there was a real interesting thing that we found out about this room. This window overlooks the garage and the driveway and would be a great vantage point for anyone that would want to see if the Ramseys were coming home that night.

What's interesting about this room - we did see that some of the drawers in the bathroom right off the bedroom were partially open - looked like they were out of place.
Also in this room there was a rope and we don't know where that rope came from. No one can explain why that rope is in this room. Also what was real interesting in this room, and it's just a small detail, is that there was a dust ruffle that was tucked in except for just a small area that seems to have been pulled out. Now does that mean that the killer may have been under that bed, we just don't know. But it’s just an observation. One of the small things that detectives look for. He could have been under there and it would be a perfect vantage point for him to go right in JonBenét's bedroom in order to take her out later."

[Screen Capture by Jayelles 'Who Killed The Pageant Queen' UK Documentary 07-11-2001] [Screen Capture by Jayelles 'Who Killed The Pageant Queen' UK Documentary 07-11-2001] [Screen Capture by Jayelles 'Who Killed The Pageant Queen' UK Documentary 07-11-2001] [Screen Capture by Jayelles 'Who Killed The Pageant Queen' UK Documentary 07-11-2001]


[Star Magazine December 11, 2001]2001-12-11: Cover of the Star Magazine 5 Year Anniversary Issue
Features last photo shoot of JonBenet taken November 11, 1996

[Prop Rope used in November 11, 1996 Photo Shoot]

CHAIN OF EVENTS 2002


[Purgatory II Forum]2002-01-12: Puragory II Forum Thread titled,
"JonBenet Ramsey Case - The Intruder Theory"



From: pinker2 1/12/2002 3:45 pm
To: ALL (34 of 37) 101.34 in reply to 101.33

I was curious about this rope situation and wanted to examine the Michigan rope swing pictures for comparison. Turns out the rope is very different.

[JonBenet on Rope Swing]

http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Plains/8144/pics/jbwheel.jpg

Knot to go unnoticed but does anybody else get the impression that the tire is flush with the ground and unable to swing? JonBenet is pulling on the rope and still the tire is stuck to the ground. Was that also a staged shot? More rope in Patsy's past....less fun for JonBenet.

CHAIN OF EVENTS 2003


[Jonbenet: The Police Files]2003-01-00: “Jonbenet: The Police Files”
by National Enquirer, Don Gentile and David Wright (Editors), January 2003


NE Book Page 245:

Patsy was shown a photo of rope found in John Andrew's bedroom

Patsy Ramsey: "I don't recognize it, specifically."

Trip DeMuth: "Okay. And that, that particular piece of rope, do you ever remember seeing anything like it around? And if you look at photo 115, you notice the... ends are unusually secured... can you think of any reason to have that kind of rope around?"

Patsy Ramsey: "I've just never seen ends like that, done like that. John had some, you know, boat ropes and things up at the lake, but it seems like when they cut those they kind of melt the ends of them or something to keep them from fraying or something. I've never seen one done like that."

Trip DeMuth: "The kind of ropes you're talking about that John used up there - "

Patsy Ramsey: "For the sailboat or - "

Trip DeMuth: "Are they colored the same or similar?"

Patsy Ramsey: "Well, some of them have like little blue flecks in them or red, or there's some white ones, you know."

Trip DeMuth: "Okay. Do you know what, what those are composed of? Is it a nylon-like that melts?"

Patsy Ramsey: "Yeah, it must, something that melts, yeah. But it seems to me like they somehow torch the ends and kind of keep them from fraying. I can't remember seeing any one looking like that."

Trip DeMuth: "You don't remember that being used anywhere in the house or yard or - "

Patsy Ramsey: "No"

Trip DeMuth: "Would you think that unusual to be found in the house?"

Patsy Ramsey: "Yeah, I mean, Burke had some ropes that he would play with through something out on the playground, you know, in that, in that picture yesterday the rope around the, the fort, you know, or something."

Trip DeMuth: "Right"

Patsy Ramsey: "Always trying to make a boat or something like that."

Trip DeMuth: "This was found inside the house"

Patsy Ramsey: "Inside the house?"

Trip DeMuth: "In John Andrew's room?"

Patsy Ramsey: "Oh. Maybe it was a, some rope he used for camping or something, I don't know."

Trip DeMuth: "Did he have rope in his room that he would use for camping?"

Patsy Ramsey: "...I don't know. I just don't remember seeing this specifically, and I don't remember ever seeing a rope like that."

Trip DeMuth: "Do you know John Andrew had a rope in that room?"

Patsy Ramsey: "No"


2003-03-31: Carnes Order March 31, 2003 - Wolf vs Ramsey Civil Case 1:00-CV-1187-JEC

SMF - Statement of Material Fact
PSMF - Plaintiff's Statement of Material Fact
PSDMF - Plaintiff's Statement Disputing Material Fact
Dep - Deposition
Def's - Defendants/Defense

Page 72

"This evidence is inconsistent with plaintiff's proposed timeline of events. That is, plaintiff has hypothesized that Mrs. Ramsey, in a moment of anger, had hit JonBenet's head against something hard in the second floor bathroom, thereby rendering her child unconscious, and then spent the rest of the night staging an elaborate kidnapping and torture scenario in the basement. Discovery of cord fibers, used to tie JonBenet's hands, in the latter's bedroom arguably undermines plaintiff's sequence of events.

Likewise, other items not belonging on the second floor were found there on the day after the murder, thereby suggesting that some preparation or activity was ongoing in that area on the night of the murder.
Specifically, a rope was found inside a brown paper sack in the guest bedroom on the second floor; defendants have indicated that neither of these items belonged to them. (SMF 181; PSMF 181.) Regardless of its ownership, there is no explanation why a bag containing a rope would be in the guest bedroom. Further, small pieces of the material on this brown sack were found in the "vacuuming of JonBenet's bed and in the body bag that was used to transport her body (SMF 181; PSMF 181), thereby suggesting that either the bag had been near JonBenet or that someone who had touched the bag had also touched JonBenet. 35
========================================
35 Finally, items were left behind that defendants assert they did not own. (Defs.' Br. In Supp. Of Summ. J. [67] at 18-19.) A baseball bat not owned by the Ramseys found on the north side of the house has fibers consistent with fibers found in the carpet in the basement where JonBenet's body was found. (SMF 185; PSMF 185.) Brown cotton fibers on JonBenet's body, the paintbrush, the duct tape and on the ligature were not sourced and do not match anything in the Ramsey home. (SMF 181; PSMF 181.)"


[jameson's Webbsleuths]2003-04-06: Webbsleuths Forum (http://www.webbsleuths.org)
"The sack of rope"


jameson
Charter Member
10561 posts Apr-06-03, 09:02 PM (EST)

6. "RE: The sack of rope"
In response to message #5

I thought the rope looked the same but was told one was much more pliable thanthe other - they were NOT the same.

I was not told that by the Ramseys and don't know if they ever got to compare the ropes side by side - - don't know where the rope is that was used in the photo shoot.

I do think that rope used in the photo shoot should be located and kept by the investigators just so this question is never an issue later.

ALSO, if they had a Christmas tree decorated in cowboy decorations, was there rope there? What was that like?

Having said that, the Ramseys have no reason at all to lie about the rope - they want to find the killer and wouldn't willfully add or subtract from the evidence pool because that would not be productive at all.

John, Patsy and JAR have all said the rop was not theirs - - so whos brought it there - and why? Questions a killer could answer.

Maybe one day he will send the answer to the authorities or the Ramseys or some news media outlet - - HEY SICKPUPPY - - I would love to hear from you - - my email and PO Box are both available - - feel free!

[jameson's Webbsleuths]


[http://www.nationalenquirer.com/]2003-04-29: NE: JONBENET CASE TAKES A STRANGE NEW TWIST

JONBENET CASE TAKES A STRANGE NEW TWIST
INVESTIGATORS FOCUS ON INTRUDER THEORY
BY DON GENTILE
April 29, 2003


(SNIP)


The Ramsey attorney Lin Wood said Keenan's comments about an intruder exonerate John and Patsy, as does the recent ruling by Judge Carnes. She dismissed a lawsuit by journalist Chris Wolf, who was named as a possible suspect in a book authored by the Ramseys. Carnes' 93 page dismissal ruling also contained never before revealed evidence in the case:

Seven windows were unlocked and a door was open in the Ramsey home after the murder; pieces of a brown paper bag were found in Jonbenet's bed- the bag itself, containing rope, was in a bedroom next to Jonbent's room; and dark animal hairs were found in her hands.

"The bag and rope did not belong to the Ramseys and the animal hair, from a dog or cat, matched nothing in the Ramsey home", said an insider.

"The feeling is the killer owns a pet."

But while Keenan is looking at other suspects, she said: "Were not excluding the Ramseys."


[jameson's Webbsleuths]2003-05-08: Webbsleuths Forum (http://www.webbsleuths.com)
"Patsy and rope"


why_nut
unregistered user
May-08-03, 04:26 PM (EST)

"Patsy and rope"

From the NE transcripts, page 245-246:
Patsy was shown a photo of rope found in John Andrew's bedroom:

PR: I don't recognize it, specifically.
TD: Okay.
TH: Okay. And that, that particular piece of rope, do you ever remember seeing anything
like it around? And if you look at photo 115, you notice the...ends are unusually secured...can you think of any reason to have that kind of rope around?

(Comment: Haney has just asked Patsy if she has seen the kind of rope, which is either hemp or sisal or some other kind of brown fibrous rope. He is not confining the discussion to the ends of the rope; subsequent questions are about the entirety of the rope as well as about the ends.)

PR: I've just never seen ends like that, done like that. John had some, you know, boat ropes and things up at the lake, but it seems like when they cut those, they kind of melt the ends of them or something to keep them from fraying or something. I've never seen one done like that.

TH: The kind of ropes you're talking about that John used up there--
PR: For the sailboat or--
TH: Are they colored the same or similar?
PR: Well, some of them have like little blue flecks in them or red, or there's some white ones, you know.
TH: Okay. Do you know what, what those are composed of? Is it a nylon-like that melts?
PR: Yeah, it must, something that melts, yeah. But it seems to me like they somehow torch the ends and kind of keep them from fraying. I can't remember seeing any one looking like that.

(Comment: Haney now goes back to the subject of the rope in general, and is not asking about the ends.)

TH: You don't remember that being used anywhere in the house or yard or--
PR: No.
TH: Would you think that unusual to be found in the house?
PR: Yeah. I mean, Burke had some ropes that he would play with through something out on the playground, you know, in that, in that picture yesterday the rope around the, the fort, you know, or something.
TH: Right.

(Comment: Patsy has now followed Haney in his line of questioning. The subject is, indeed, no longer about the ends, but the kind of rope in general.)

PR: Always trying to make a boat or something like that.
TH: This was found inside the house.
PR: Inside the house?
TH: In John Andrew's room?
PR: Oh. Maybe it was a, some rope he used for camping or something, I don't know.
TD: Did he have rope in his room that he would use for camping?
PR: ...
I don't know. I just don't remember seeing this specifically, and I don't remember ever seeing a rope like that.

Patsy does not remember ever seeing a rope like the one in John Andrew's room? There is proof she had. Look at this photo from the book JONBENET'S MOTHER. It shows such rope appearing within a set decoration she arranged while she was volunteering at High Peaks school, where Burke was attending.

The circled area to the left shows the rope. See the dummies in the photo, resembling scarecrows somewhat? There are three in the photo. One is wearing a plaid shirt, a small part of which can be seen under Patsy's left arm.

That same scarecrow was taken home and stored in the Ramsey basement. Look at this picture. Do you see it?

That scarecrow has, as one might have expected of a scarecrow, a rope belt. And that rope belt does, despite Patsy's protestations to the contrary, resemble the rope found in John Andrew's room. So Patsy
did see "a rope like that," despite her testimony to the contrary. She owned "rope like that."

And in an intruder scenario, can someone explain to me why the intruder made absolutely no use of that rope at all, despite its easy availability right there where JonBenet died? If one wanted to incriminate the parents, there is no sense in using cord that was brought, if the victim's own house provided a potentially very scary (and much more photogenic, in keeping with the movie theme) means of binding JonBenet's wrists in a way we are all much more familiar with.

If, on the other hand, a parent was guilty, the lack of rope-belt use is understandable, because when a person lives in a house, it is easy to forget that materials one owns are right in front of one's own eyes, because those materials are seen every day. An intruder does not have the luxury of not noticing materials that can be exploited for control. A house inhabitant, on the other hand, cannot force herself or himself to notice things that came to be ignored long ago.


[Why_Nut's Example1][Why_Nut's Example2] [Why_Nut's Example3][Why_Nut's Example4]

















jameson
Charter Member
10170 posts May-08-03, 04:35 PM (EST)

1. "RE: Patsy and rope"
In response to message #0

Well, I am impressed!

I honestly had not seen that before.

I wonder where the decoration is and if the rope has been compared to the one found in John Andrew's room.

Questions:

1. Is the rope the same - - there are many kinds of brown rope - are they a match?

2. IF it is a match, who made that decoration? Was it Patsy or was it a group and did Patsy just end up with the dummy when they were cleaning up?

3. IF it is a match, if Patsy made that decoration, I would think that the new investigators would want to review that with the Ramseys - - where did she get the rope, how much did she get of it and where is the rest? Who had access to it?

Very interesting - - and certainly new to me.

Thanks for sharing.



why_nut
unregistered user
May-08-03, 05:53 PM (EST)

"4. "DonBradley"
In response to message #3

I recall seeing images of the rope from JAR's room and it is a very stout, sturdy rope such as might be employed in towing a car or boat or tying something down outside in a high wind. The 'household ropes' appear to be closer to decorative than functional, they are thinner and far more pliable."


The perspective your memory places on the rope from John Andrew's room is skewed by the fact that that photo was a closeup, and your mental comparison becomes of rope of X visual width versus rope of Y visual width, without compensation for the change in distance. The rope in JAR's room was very pliable itself. The photo of it shows that it can be bent into loops of just such an arc as you can see the rope belt drooping into. And note the ruler next to the JAR rope; it is in centimeter increments, a measurement near enough for discussion to half an inch to show that the bedroom rope was likely common half-inch rope, visually comparable to the belt rope, which is also near enough to half an inch (for comparison, look at how the belt rope is slightly larger than the shafts of the nearby golf clubs).


[Why_Nut's Example5]












why_nut
unregistered user
May-13-03, 12:47 PM (EST)

"44. "DonBradley"
In response to message #43

I would think that from a time-management/cost perspective, it is unlikely that the scarecrow or any of its accessory items was hand crafted by Patsy Ramsey. It is undoubtedly a store-bought item and therefore it has no 'implication' about Patsy's knowledge at all."


I think Susan Stine disagrees with you. JONBENET'S MOTHER, page 104:

"One year, the school decided to have a family party based on a western theme. This was to be not only a fund-raiser, but also was to build community spirit. Patsy took on a major responsibility, wanting to make something really special for the children. Patsy invited Burke's class and their parents to her home to make preparations.
This included painting scenery and making props. What a wonderful, memorable (and messy!) afternoon. One of Patsy's biggest talents is her organization. She had all of the materials ready for the day--paint and cardboard and fabric and ribbon, etc. And she didn't just supervise. She pitched in and did the hard work--painting, cutting, glueing and anything else that needed to be done."

This would be an issue that Jameson could clear up directly and personally. Given her friendly contact with Susan Stine (if not entirely with Patsy anymore), it would take Jameson no more than a phone call today to ask Susan if Patsy made the prop and provided the rope for the belt, and if not, who did.

I hope people will note, though that I raised the issue not to question whether the rope on the scarecrow's belt was an extension piece from the rope in John Andrew's bedroom. The issue was that I believe Patsy can be proven to have lied, or at attempted to lie, when she said in her interview with authorities that she had not seen rope "like" the one in JAR's bedroom around the house. She had to have seen rope "like it." There is rope "like it" on the scarecrow. And the Court TV program JONBENET: A SECOND LOOK was even more revelatory. This never-previously-broadcast photo shows, indeed, more rope "like it" in the house. Where was this rope located? On a shelf below the basement bathroom window. And one again the question must be asked: if there was so much ligature material to be found in the basement, why was none of it used by the intruder on JonBenet, if the goals were both to implicate the parents and to, as you so often say, have fun? A harsh, thick piece of rope is far more frightening to contemplate around one's daughter's neck than a thin ligature which did so little damage that not one drop of blood from crushed tissues was found below her throat's external skin.


[Why_Nut's Example6]


[Screen Capture by ACandyRose]2003-05-10: Court TV - The System, "JonBenet: A Second Look"
Produced by Michael Chrisman, David Mills, Exec. Prod. Michael Tracey

Screen Captures done by ACandyRose

LOU SMIT - If an intruder had spent any time at all checking out the house he would have noticed that on various doors and windows there was a sticker indicating that the house was alarmed. On a lot of these older houses, the windows leading into the basement are not alarmed and that drew my attention to this window on the north side of the house. It's a small window leading into the basement. When we inspected the photographs we did see something very interesting.

NARRATOR - Smit found the dust on the window frame had been disturbed. He also found what he thought were finger marks. He concluded that someone may have tried to open this window. Yet an interior photograph showed it remained locked and undisturbed - if there was an attempt, it had failed.

[2003-05-10 Court TV - The System, 'JonBenet: A Second Look'] [2003-05-10 Court TV - The System, 'JonBenet: A Second Look' - Smit: 'On a lot of these older houses, the windows leading into the basement are not alarmed and that drew my attention to this window on the north side of the house. It's a small window leading into the basement. When we inspected the photographs we did see something very interesting.'] [2003-05-10 Court TV - The System, 'JonBenet: A Second Look' - NARRATOR - 'Smit found the dust on the window frame had been disturbed. He also found what he thought were finger marks. He concluded that someone may have tried to open this window. Yet an interior photograph showed it remained locked and undisturbed - if there was an attempt, it had failed.'] [2003-05-10 Court TV - The System, 'JonBenet: A Second Look']

(SNIP)


LOU SMIT back in house - Whether or not the note was written in this alcove or not, we don't know, but we do know that the ransom note was found on the bottom step of this spiral staircase. From here it's only a short distance to JonBenét's room. This is JonBenét's bedroom but the room right next to it is the guest bedroom and there was a real interesting thing that we found out about this room. This window overlooks the garage and the driveway and would be a great vantage point for anyone that would want to see if the Ramseys were coming home that night. What's interesting about this room - we did see that some of the drawers in the bathroom, right off the bedroom, were partially open - looked like they were out of place. Also in this room there was found a rope and we don't know where that rope came from. No one can explain why that rope is in this room. Also what was real interesting in this room, and it's just a small detail, is that there was a dust ruffle that was tucked in except for just a small area that seems to have been pulled out. Now does that mean that the killer may have been under that bed? We just don't know. But it's just an observation. One of the small things that detectives look for. He could have been under there and it would be a perfect vantage point for him to go right into JonBenét's bedroom in order to take her out later.


[2003-05-10 Court TV - The System, 'JonBenet: A Second Look'] [2003-05-10 Court TV - The System, 'JonBenet: A Second Look'] [2003-05-10 Court TV - The System, 'JonBenet: A Second Look'] [2003-05-10 Court TV - The System, 'JonBenet: A Second Look']

[2003-05-10 Court TV - The System, 'JonBenet: A Second Look'] [2003-05-10 Court TV - The System, 'JonBenet: A Second Look'] [2003-05-10 Court TV - The System, 'JonBenet: A Second Look'] [2003-05-10 Court TV - The System, 'JonBenet: A Second Look']


[Dan Arams Show July 7, 2003]2003-07-17: The Dan Abrams Show with Michael Kane, Lawrence Schiller, Wendy Murphy and Larry Pozner

ABRAMS: Let’s start with a federal court opinion that has somehow evaded the radar. A 93-page finding that basically says that John and Patsy Ramsey probably did not kill JonBenet. Federal Court Judge Julie Carnes wrote that-quote-”The weight of the evidence is more consistent with a theory that an intruder murdered JonBenet than it is with a theory that Mrs. Ramsey did so.”

Wow. Now keep in mind, this was a civil case brought by Robert Christian Wolf against the Ramseys. Wolf was mentioned in the Ramseys’ book, “The Death of Innocence” as someone the police should have been investigated further. So when he sued, he didn’t have the prosecution’s evidence, only the evidence available to the public.




MICHAEL KANE, FMR. RAMSEY SPECIAL PROSECUTOR: Hi, Dan.

ABRAMS: All right. So, what do we make of this? I mean a federal judge ruling that she believe it’s more likely than not that an intruder committed this crime.

KANE: "Well I think as you said at the top of the show, the federal court was making a ruling based on the civil case and the civil case presented the evidence that had been gathered in discovery in that case. And given what was agreed to by both parties in the presentation of facts to the court, I think that the court made the right decision.
I guess the bigger question then is were the facts presented to the court in the context of the civil case consistent with the facts that were developed in the police case, and I don’t think you can draw that correlation, because there was no access that the parties had been given to information that had been contained in the police files."



KANE: "Well I think that there’s-maybe we’re playing semantics here, but if there’s a suggestion that someone was targeted to the exclusion of anybody else, that’s what I take exception to. The police investigation, contrary to what Mr. Wood said in the little clip you just showed, the police investigation never excluded anybody with the exception of Burke Ramsey from the focus of the case. And so I don’t think that you can say that the police investigation was just solely looking at the- at Mr. and Mrs. Ramsey."

ABRAMS: So is there more evidence out there? I mean is there more evidence we don’t know about?

KANE: "Absolutely. You’re talking about an investigation that was conducted by police officers who have powers to get witnesses to speak that civil litigants don’t, in spite of the fact that they have subpoena power. But more importantly, the resources that were available to the police and the prosecutors, particularly with the grand jury and the compulsory power that the grand jury had, I mean, we didn’t sit out there-I was involved in the case for about 18 months and worked on it full time."

"I don’t think that any of the litigants in the civil case worked this case full time for the period of time that I did, and I got into the case 18 months after it happened, and the police had been working full time during that period.
So clearly, there’s a lot more information out there that’s never been made public and certainly wasn’t made part of the civil case"



KANE: First of all, the thing I was going to say is
if Mary Keenan has reached this conclusion, she clearly has not reviewed her own file because I don’t want to get into a lot of specifics about this because of ethical reasons, but there are clearly in the police file answers to a lot of the things that the court said had never been established. I mean, I can give you-I don’t know where this came from that these were sophisticated knots. I don’t know that anybody had the opportunity to untie those knots who was an expert in knots, but the police department had somebody who fit that category and that was not the opinion of that person. These were very simple knots."

"The thing about the stun gun that everybody keeps coming back to. There was one person who was qualified who actually looked at that little girl’s body on the autopsy table and that was Dr. Meyer, who’s a forensic pathologist. He looked at those very marks and said that they were abrasions. It is a quantum leap-you can take a stun gun and put it up against somebody’s body...

KANE: ... and it’s going to leave a burn. It does leave an abrasion. So all these other opinions that have come out that said that this was a stun gun, there is absolutely no way they would ever get into evidence because there is no evidence that these were burns.


ABRAMS: ... there were other experts like Mr. Doberson and others and Lou Smit who have said they absolutely believe that there was a stun gun used.

KANE:
But they’re basing that based on photographs of marks on her body. When the uncontradicted evidence of Dr. Meyer is that these were not burns.



KANE:
"This is what the court’s opinion said. It said-in its opinion, it said defendants argue that the opinions of plaintiffs’ experts should not be-talking about handwriting experts...... should not be admitted because the field of forensic document examination is not sufficiently reliable. In their (UNINTELLIGIBLE) support of..... defendants argue that the science does not meet reliability standards (UNINTELLIGIBLE). So, by their very own motion...... they’re saying that handwriting is garbage..."



ABRAMS: ... I was particularly persuaded by in the judge’s opinion. This brown paper sack apparently found in a guest bedroom. [Letter-full screen “D”]-found in the guest bedroom, contained rope inside, fibers from the sack apparently found in JonBenet’s bed and the bag used to transport her body to the coroner. That to me is pretty strong evidence of someone else in that house coming in with this sack to commit this crime.



ABRAMS: And I have to tell you, Lou Smit made his case to me, and I have to tell you, you know, the guy makes a persuasive case. Michael Kane, let me just give you the final 30 seconds in this segment and then we’re going to come back.

KANE:
"Well I don’t know where this information about the sack and fibers from the sack that were found-I mean, I can tell you, that’s news to me. Number two, it wasn’t just a guest bedroom, it was John Andrew’s bedroom."

KANE: "It had a lot of his stuff in there, and he was a backpacker, and the fact that there was a sack-it was a rucksack is what it was, with a rope in it. I don’t know if that’s necessarily inconsistent with that."


[www.cybersleuths.com]
2003-07-18: Cybersleuths Forum, Topic:
"Dan Abrams Report -- July 17, 2003"


Lethal
Member # 661
Member Rated:
posted 07-18-2003 01:25 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It was good to hear ~MK clarify the type of sack used to store some rope ...not the rope....found in ~JAR'z room. It was a ruck sack ....not a paper sack...as has been posted around the net...did Dan say that?? Ahhh ha! Uhhhh...'torn fragments of this paper sack were found in ~JBR's bed...and in the body-bag' Nahhhh...

The rucks are more commonly made of canvas for mtn. climberz. Don't we usually call them back-packz. ohhh...fwiw... Just before Xmas96 ~JonnieB~ had climbed one of those 'mall walls' of fabricated rocks and ledges and loved it so much her father enrolled her in rock climbing classes....to begin in 1997....or so it's been said. Was the ruck-rope for her ? Yepperz...~candy...I heard ~MK say ~JAR~ was a backpacker ....the mountain-climber in the family? ...makes sense he would have a ruck w/rope in his room.

~Michael Kane should have been given more 'credible-he-knows-some-evidence' talk-time...too bad he was so carefully woodzy-chilled on his opinions Re:911call AND etc....like ummm.. who he thinks the frik'nmurderer is.

Otherwize.....some fantastic fact un-fubar'n.!~

I do like the leather rucks bettah...that's why I posted it...ahhh ha!

[www.cybersleuths.com] quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Classic Ruck Sack is basically a modernized version of the WWII paratroopers pack. Simple and comfortable is the best description. No internal frame, no funky design features or fashionable accessories. Updated features include contoured shoulder straps, movable chest strap and a closed cell foam padded back with draw string top load closure. We also put a key clip inside so you know where your truck keys are. This pack is perfect for scouting trips or day hiking. If you have been looking for that perfect knock about pack this is it!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 07-18-2003, 10:25 AM: Message edited by: Lethal ]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 330 | Registered: Jan 97 | IP: Logged


[Purgatory II Forum]2003-10-16: Puragory II Forum Thread titled,
"Today - Joke of the Day"



From: Maeven (ImMaeven) 10/16/2003 8:42 pm
To: ayelean (132 of 237) 854.132 in reply to 854.129

A rope walked into a bar and ordered a drink. The bartender said, "Hey, we don't serve ropes!", and booted him out.

The rope was really mad, and walked around the block. He began pulling at his topknot, and walked back into the bar, and ordered a drink again.

The bartender said, "Hey, aren't you the rope that was just in here? We don't serve ropes!"

The rope looked at him and said, "Of course not. I am a frayed knot!"

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

CHAIN OF EVENTS 2006


[Forums For Justice at www.forumsforjustice.org]2006-08-06: Forums For Justice
on thread titled, "Crime scene pics--again"


August 5, 2006, 4:16 am, Sat Aug 5 4:16:19 CDT 2006
koldkase
FFJ Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,454
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.geocities.com/lovelypigeon/bedroom_jar_guest.html

I wanted to bring the black bag at the foot of JAR's bed to this thread because remember that Carnes wrote in her opinion, Wolf v Ramsey, that there were paper bag fibers VACUUMED from JonBenet's bed that came from the "paper" bag with the rope found in JAR's bedroom. Carnes also stated that those same fibers were found in the body bag with JonBenet.

Now this is why I resent Smit having control over which of the PowerPoint crime scene pictures are available to the public and which ones aren't. Was he lying to Carnes about a "paper" bag containing the rope? Did he have a crime scene picture of it? Or is this picture with the black bag a rogue "stolen crime scene picture"? Is it nothing more than a picture taken by someone else after LE released the house and the black bag was staged for it? How can we ever know for sure?

Michael Kane stated on TV that he remembered the bag with the rope in JAR's room to be a duffle type bag. This would be consistent with this picture. But what to make of the bag fibers Carnes is so sure is evidence of an intruder?

I think it's fair to say that forensics vacuumed a lot of places in that house, and a few stray bag fibers being transferred from one location's marked vacuum bag to another's doesn't seem to me to be that impossible. Unless Carnes SAW a crime scene picture of that rope in a brown paper bag in JAR's room, I think we have a better explanation.

Someone here...wombat? JustChillun?...reminded us that LE puts paper bags on the hands and feet of bodies before they're transported to keep any evidence on them from being tainted or lost. Paper bags are used because the body won't sweat in them like plastic, again, aiding in maintaining the evidence. We looked it up when we noticed the picture of JonBenet's body at the home, with her hands in front of her, raised but not high like that tabloid drawing with them thrown back on each side. In this picture, she was lying on her side, and there they were: brown paper bags on her hands. Then we found a reference to that...maybe the autopsy report? Somewhere, anyhow.

So is this ANOTHER piece of evidence Smit used to mislead Carnes to his "intruder"? It sure sounds like Smit jumping to his loopy conclusions.

But now you know why I want to see the full PowerPoint. It's not fair that Smit can use LE case files which belong to the people of Colorado, to compose a personal slide show which he has used even to influence a judge's decision in a libel suit, and then to distribute it as a private citizen into the public domain, but only to those he chooses, where it is censored for their commercial interests. In such a case, I feel it is in the public's interest to evaluate the same information Smit and his followers have, as he uses it to put forth his personal theory with government information which he has been given control disperses as propaganda.

But in Colorado, they don't much care for the law. They just make it up as they go.

CLICK HERE: Flight 755 15th Street Main Directory



Home 1998 to 2007 ACandyRose©
E-Mail